Comments on Head to screen collision (H2SC): Wicket and Guice integration: an alternate route.....

Its been a while and then some, since I dabbled in...

2012-02-01T18:20:28.286+02:00

Its been a while and then some, since I dabbled in this code, but if memory serves, you shouldn't be in a situation where you are serializing the Injector, this means you're doing something wrong.

This post is two years old, many things have changed in both Guice and Wicket since it was written.

Found it. In my previous comment, the class should...

2012-02-01T18:03:25.689+02:00

Found it. In my previous comment, the class should be replaced by GuiceWebApplicationFactory instead... Maybe it's something specific to Wicket 1.5 ?

HTH

In the following piece of code: params.put(Wi...

2012-02-01T17:51:54.023+02:00
In the following piece of code:

params.put(WicketFilter.APP_FACT_PARAM, WicketGuiceAppFactory.class.getName());

What is WicketGuiceAppFactory? Shouldn't it be WicketGuiceAppProvider?

Thanks for the post, very useful. For your information, I tried it with Wicket 1.5.4 and it seems to work (except a small serialization error: java.io.NotSerializableException: com.google.inject.internal.InjectorImpl$4...) trying to fix that.

Hi, Sorry for the delayed response, I have been a...

2011-03-28T22:20:40.907+02:00
Hi,

Sorry for the delayed response, I have been a little bit away from the wicket world of pleasure lately :(

If you could provide more details here, I'll try to get into it more.

Yaniv

Hi Yaniv, thanks for sharing this... It works nice...

2011-03-13T16:32:54.405+02:00
Hi Yaniv, thanks for sharing this... It works nicelly with wicket 1.4.

But when I tried to do the same with 1.5 it doesn't work yet..

Have you tried this approach with version 1.5 ?

thanks

2011-02-19T18:47:13.317+02:00
This comment has been removed by the author.

@Cristiano: Unfortunately I'm not familiar eno...

2011-02-19T18:46:59.024+02:00
@Cristiano: Unfortunately I'm not familiar enough with Shiro to provide you with an answer

@Anonymous: yes ;)

One question, even using this approach we still ne...

2011-02-18T00:57:51.846+02:00
One question, even using this approach we still need to use org.apache.wicket.guice.GuiceComponentInjector in app init()?

public class WicketGuiceApp extends WebApplication {
...
protected void init() {
addComponentInstantiationListener(new GuiceComponentInjector(this, injector));
}
...

thanks

Hi, nice route!! could you tell me how could I in...

2011-02-17T17:46:54.104+02:00
Hi, nice route!!

could you tell me how could I inject Shiro filters using this Guice approach?

thanks

Hi, thank you for your excellent input... 1. I li...

2010-07-16T00:26:56.273+03:00
Hi, thank you for your excellent input...

1. I like this approach of injecting the app in the constructor, its very functional and clean, however, imo it breaks the semantics of createApplication(), in my mind this method should return a new instance each time its called.

I'm thinking about changing the provider to an assisted guice factory, so I can bind to different implementations of WebApplication in different project (which your approach supports, by the way)

2. Awesome tip! I think you should shoot it to the warp list so everyone will enjoy it :)

Here some propositions : 1. Don't use a Provi...

2010-07-15T22:17:02.327+03:00
Here some propositions :

1. Don't use a Provider but inject directly the Application created by guice. That way the application can also have injected fields:

@Singleton
public class WicketGuiceFilter extends WicketFilter {

private final WebApplication app;

@Inject public WicketGuiceFilter(WebApplication app) {
this.app = app;
}

protected IWebApplicationFactory getApplicationFactory() {
return new IWebApplicationFactory() {
public WebApplication createApplication(WicketFilter filter) {
return app;
}};
}
}

2. If you use WARP, use a pattern to exclude the resources from the PersistenceFilter :

filterRegex("/*^(?!.*(swf|jpg|jpeg|png|ico|gif|css|js)).*$").through(PersistenceFilter.class);

Thanks! (Posted to wicket list a few days ago)

2010-06-01T20:52:31.543+03:00
Thanks!

(Posted to wicket list a few days ago)

Yeah nice more the Wicket and Guice way, remember ...

2010-06-01T20:28:05.360+03:00
Yeah nice more the Wicket and Guice way, remember to post it to the wicket user list..

Thanks for sharing!

2010-05-30T08:36:54.632+03:00
Thanks for sharing!